The following is reproduced from Edie. It speaks for itself.
Renewable energy company Ecotricity has hit out at
the Government for its approach to planning, claiming it has introduced
conflicting rules for certain projects.
Last week the
Government announced that it will allow applications from business and
commercial projects to be determined at national level, avoiding local level
decisions.
However, at the beginning of June the Government announced
that planning
guidelines would give local communities earlier and better involvement in the
siting of onshore wind farms.
Ecotricity founder, Dale Vince, said:
"At the beginning of June, the government announced that it was going to give
"local communities a greater say on planning" and as evidence of its apparent
commitment to localism, it issued yet another set of planning guidelines that
meant local communities had greater opportunity to veto onshore wind projects -
this was supposed to be what Eric Pickles called "localism in action".
"Now, barely three weeks later, the government has announced that it is
to allow projects such as food processing plants, theme parks, warehouses and
hotel complexes to completely bypass those local communities and seek planning
permission directly at national level. Where is the localism in that?
Vince backed the need to cut red tape and agreed that an efficient and
effective planning process "that balances local opinion with national interest"
must be put in place.
"Surely it should be consistent, rather than the
situation we have now where a theme park is fast-tracked as nationally important
infrastructure, while wind energy is left in a kind of planning ghetto, in the
same category as a new garden fence," he added.
As I said - it speaks for itself - DCLG appears to be acting as incoherently as ever.
No comments:
Post a Comment