Jottings from SW Surrey. This used to be mainly about energy but now I've retired it's just an old man's rant. From 23 June 2016 'til 12 December 2019 Brexit dominated but that is now a lost cause. So, I will continue to point out the stupidities of government when I'm so minded; but you may also find the odd post on climate change, on popular science or on genealogy - particularly my own family.
Tuesday, 29 April 2014
When is Horizontal Drilling not Trespass?
Despite what I said the other day about the seeming lack of a "shale gas revolution" the recent announcement by HMG about potential changes to legislation to allow drilling beneath land owned by others does demonstate that some parts of government are trying to push exploration for shale hydrocarbons forward. Currently it seems that legal precedent gives ownership rights as far down as one can define "strata" as this briefing from the Hugh James practice explains. As the HJ piece says - the final balance between land-owners' rights and energy exploration is an interesting one.
Localism?
I missed this when it first hit the singing wire but thought it worth highlighting as it is yet more evidence of Planet Pickles' grasp of the principles of localism. According to edie the gravitational pull of Planet Pickles has pulled in 33 wind projects, or 93% of wind capacity currently at appeal. It's worth reading Dale Vince's comments in this piece: "We've worked diligently through the entire planning process, passed every test, including a public enquiry - only to have our application refused by a man that knows nothing on the subject". Quite.
Friday, 25 April 2014
Russia - Ukraine - Gas
There's been quite a lot of chatter recently about the potential effect of the Ukraine crisis on imports of Russian gas. According to a recent report from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies about 30% of Europe's gas demand is supplied by Russia and about half of this comes via Ukraine. In a speech he made on 21 March 2014 Russian Prime Minister Medvedev suggested that Ukraine might owe Russia some $16bn. Of this, about $2bn is owed to Gazprom. The Institute paper argues that this sort of debt led to Gazprom cutting off deliveries to Ukrainian customers previously and the subsequent diversion of transit gas bound for Europe to Ukrainian consumers caused a severe tightening in European supplies. It is the threat of similar action this time around that is exercising many minds.
The Institue paper points out that the situation is less severe than in the past because the Nord Stream pipeline (Russia - Germany via a sub-Baltic Sea route) is now complete. The paper also makes soothing comments about other pipeline projects which it suggests would make transit of Russian gas through Ukraine unnecessary post 2020.
Of course, none of this alleviates the fundamental problem of over-dependence on Russia. As Nick Butler has pointed out in a recent blog post, by 2030 under certain scenarios European dependence on Russian gas could be a staggering 75%. The Russians may be desperate for foreign currency (aka dollars) but just how desperate?
If you believe George Osborne we don't have to worry: "We need to cut our energy costs. We're going to do this by investing in new sources of energy: new nuclear power, renewables, and a shale gas revolution" (my italics). One wonders whether he has been captured by the gravitational field of Planet Pickles. Someone needs to tell George that nuclear ain't cheap and it takes an inordinately long time to build; that renewables ain't cheap and many suffer from intermittency, seasonal fluctuation and diurnal fluctuation; and that there is little sign of any shale gas revolution and virtually no sign of the government trying to start one.
'Tis time for some sensible energy planning, coupled with the guts to deliver what will inevitably be a difficult policy.
The Institue paper points out that the situation is less severe than in the past because the Nord Stream pipeline (Russia - Germany via a sub-Baltic Sea route) is now complete. The paper also makes soothing comments about other pipeline projects which it suggests would make transit of Russian gas through Ukraine unnecessary post 2020.
Of course, none of this alleviates the fundamental problem of over-dependence on Russia. As Nick Butler has pointed out in a recent blog post, by 2030 under certain scenarios European dependence on Russian gas could be a staggering 75%. The Russians may be desperate for foreign currency (aka dollars) but just how desperate?
If you believe George Osborne we don't have to worry: "We need to cut our energy costs. We're going to do this by investing in new sources of energy: new nuclear power, renewables, and a shale gas revolution" (my italics). One wonders whether he has been captured by the gravitational field of Planet Pickles. Someone needs to tell George that nuclear ain't cheap and it takes an inordinately long time to build; that renewables ain't cheap and many suffer from intermittency, seasonal fluctuation and diurnal fluctuation; and that there is little sign of any shale gas revolution and virtually no sign of the government trying to start one.
'Tis time for some sensible energy planning, coupled with the guts to deliver what will inevitably be a difficult policy.
Tuesday, 8 April 2014
The BBC and Peaches
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)